It’s time to rediscover the intimate magic of a phone call

New Romantics — Today, all of our relationships exist on our mobiles. But, in a world where intimacy has had to adapt to the presence of technology, the simple act of speaking on the phone still retains some kind of starry-eyed power.

There’s a pervasive idea that young people hate speaking on the phone. It’s an ironic stereotype, really – we have our phones in our hands almost every minute of our waking lives, yet it feels ludicrous to actually use them to make calls.

But for a long time, I embodied that stereotype. I steadfastly refused to pick up the phone to unknown numbers; if a friend called me unexpectedly then I’d feel a heavy anxiety thud onto my chest, convinced that the only reason they might be phoning is because someone was hurt or dead. I never listened to my voicemails, simply watched them pile up until, nerves too fraught, I binged on them all at once, missed appointments and tinny ten-second silences from calls not hung up in time. The only person who really called me was my Mum – apt, really. She belonged to another generation, one who – to me – did phone calls.

Recently, that’s changed – at least with one person, someone I’ve allowed myself the (to me slightly perverse) pleasure of long, drawn-out calls with. We speak for hours, my day unfolding in unexpected ways, my schedule ruined, plans rearranged around ongoing conversations. Sometimes, compelled to carry on the conversation, I walk and talk instead of getting the underground; five miles, six miles, more, just to hear about their day.

So unfamiliar am I with using the phone that the act of calling itself starts to feel quasi-erotic, the dial-tone luxurious in the potential it holds. The content is entirely platonic, not sexual; it’s not like we’re heavy breathing down the phone, asking “what are you wearing right now?”, “what would you do if I was there?”. The point, in lots of ways, is that I’m definitively not there. But phone calls are private, unreadable, have a striking immediacy; they’re also strangely incongruous, what with our being in different time zones. One of us is deep into work while the other gets coffee, wakes up; their lunch coincides with my leaving the house to meet friends. It’s a unique kind of discordance; it takes me out of myself.

In lots of ways, these phone calls feel entirely different to a text message or an email: secret, urgent. Nothing is written down, obviously, so everything we say is ephemeral, vanishes as soon as it comes into the world; invisible ink sinking quietly into a page. The screenshots I take of the four-hour-long call times are the only evidence they even happened, the notes in my diary I sometimes write to remind me of what we talked about. I even start to delete other calls from my call log so that their name stays at the top of the list; on the tube, safe without signal, I sit and stare at it, unable to analyse in the way I would a text but stubbornly trying to all the same.

It’s refreshing. It’s also unnerving. We spend so much time trying to divine meaning from our messages; a phone call is more simple. Instant messaging – texting, DMing, WhatsApping, whatever – can happen anywhere; a different kind of intimacy, more casual, less thoughtful. A phone call can’t, isn’t. You have to stop, really focus. You have to be present. Sometimes you have to be vulnerable in a way you don’t in a message. Sometimes you’re taken entirely out of your own life and into a new one, one you share with that other person. It’s there, unmistakably, even if it does only last for hours at a time.

All the problems of intimacy still happen on the phone; it’s not better or more profound, necessarily than a text. The world you create isn’t necessarily real, either: you can still lie, you can still be lied to. And, like a message, this world can be discrete: it doesn’t have to mean anything outside itself. It doesn’t tie you to someone. It doesn’t constitute a promise; it certainly doesn’t constitute a commitment. Creating such a world can also, at times, be a lie itself: a mirage. But it still means something: the act itself still means something. And, sometimes, doesn’t it feel good to be suspended in time?

Follow Emily Reynolds on Twitter.

Enjoyed this article? Like Huck on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.


You might like

Activism

How the Apple Store union movement came to the UK

Power to the workers — Inspired by successful unionisation efforts among US employees, workers from across the pond are now gearing up to take on the tech giant.

Written by: Richard Gall

Activism

How Tinder became a weapon in the Russia-Ukraine war

Swiping in solidarity — Looking for ways to support Ukraine, people have been turning to the dating app to gather Russian intel and to spread awareness about the war. But just how effective are these tactics?

Written by: Severija Bielskyte

Activism

Body-worn cameras are quietly taking over London

Surveillance nation — FoIs obtained by Huck reveal just how widespread body cams are among police and TfL staff. While promised to increase accountability, the proliferation of the tech raises questions over who it really serves.

Written by: Will Grimond

Activism

Tech workers are fighting back against employee surveillance

Power in numbers — Invasive workplace surveillance has become a reality for many remote workers over the pandemic. Now, tech workers are unionising to lead the resistance.

Written by: Sian Bradley

Activism

‘It’s a wild west’: Inside Margate’s Airbnb crisis

Homes not hotels — In recent years, an influx of visitors to the Kent coast has caused house prices to soar and a sense of community to be lost. While private landlords and lettings platform Airbnb benefit, local people are being forced out of their homes.

Written by: Sophie Church

Activism

The teen ‘finfluencers’ trying to keep hustle culture alive

Crypto kids — On ‘FinTok’, teenagers who’ve hit the crypto jackpot say they want to help their peers do the same – but are they simply perpetuating a broken capitalist system?

Written by: Chloé Meley

Huck is supported by our readers, subscribers and Club Huck members. It is also made possible by sponsorship from:

Signup to our newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter to informed with the cutting edge of sport, music and counterculture, featuring personal takes on the state of media and pop culture from Emma Garland, former Digital Editor of Huck, exclusive interviews, recommendations and more.

Please wait...

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.