How digital life is distorting love, loss & emotional trauma

New Romantics — In her latest column, writer and author Emily Reynolds examines how technology, with all its noise, has made the silence of a lost relationship louder than ever.

Silence sometimes feels like nothing at all. Every day we fire off a thousand texts that never get returned, conversations with friends or family or housemates or colleagues ebbing and flowing without much thought of who wrote last or what they said; digital small talk.

When we desperately want someone to reply, though, silence begins to feel more loaded. Sometimes we start to become obsessed; we check whether our message has been read over and over again; we put our phones down but end up thinking about them anyway. The burden of waiting is almost tangible: it sticks to us like ink on our fingers, sends us half-frenzied with unmoored want. It consumes our thoughts.

So powerful is this feeling that if our phones finally do ring during this purgatory, it can cause a genuine and often extreme physical response. Early this year, after months of not speaking to someone who I had once designated their own special ring- and text-tones, hearing the sound when they messaged unexpectedly was like being shaken; a true jolt. My heart started racing and I felt a spike of nausea slice through my chest; I truly thought I was going to be sick.

Their non-presence had felt so substantial; I’d carried it with me like a trinket, trailed it around behind me like a security blanket, watching it get shabbier every day. This absence being pierced so palpably by a chirpy text alert didn’t seem right; it didn’t fit the grand story of love and loss I’d told myself at all.

Because, in their lengthy absence, I had started to write a story that it turned out had never really been true at all. I had overstated to myself how much I’d really loved them, how well we’d got on; I’d found meaning in old messages that had no meaning at all.  Eventually, contact resumed, I realised that I’d created them out of thin air, and the relationship I’d craved to rekindle for so long finally fizzled and died of its own accord. The person I’d grieved, who I’d carried solemnly with me every day, was an avatar for something else entirely; technology, with all its noise, had made the silence feel bigger than it really was.

I talk with my friend Faridah about it and she teaches me the word ‘confabulation’. “Like when people have amnesia,” she explains. “It’s a defence mechanism for the brain to make things up to explain the gaps in memory because the concept that you have no idea what happened is so terrifying.”

And what is silence if not a gap? What is non-communication if not a blankness, a blackness, a void? When our primary communication with a person is online and then it suddenly stops, there’s nothing left at all: a cavity. Of course we feel the need to fill that gap with someone or something else; of course we project onto the other person; of course we misinterpret the endless, pointless clues they left for us in their emails, their voice notes, in the photos they sent us, in our call logs.

We leave so many traces of ourselves online, too, that we’re never really gone; we can never really disappear from someone’s life. Someone might stop replying to us, but chances are they’ll still be posting pictures of themselves, still be tweeting, still exist in some form online. They’re not really gone, then; they’re half-there, a manifestation of something we can’t touch but long to; a hologram that glitters on our fingers but disappears as soon as we close our fist.

Barthes describes waiting as a delirium; “the being I am waiting for is not real,” he writes. “I create and re-create it over and over, starting from my capacity to love, starting from my need for it.” There are echoes of this in the way we wait for replies that, deep down, we know are probably not going to come and will never really fulfil us even if they do. Because sometimes we’re waiting for someone that doesn’t exist: sometimes we’re waiting for a version of ourselves that we’ve projected onto someone else.

Sometimes you think you’ve created an intimacy with someone: look closer, though, and you find that the only person who was there all along was you.

Follow Emily Reynolds on Twitter.

Enjoyed this article? Like Huck on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.


You might like

Activism

How the Apple Store union movement came to the UK

Power to the workers — Inspired by successful unionisation efforts among US employees, workers from across the pond are now gearing up to take on the tech giant.

Written by: Richard Gall

Activism

How Tinder became a weapon in the Russia-Ukraine war

Swiping in solidarity — Looking for ways to support Ukraine, people have been turning to the dating app to gather Russian intel and to spread awareness about the war. But just how effective are these tactics?

Written by: Severija Bielskyte

Activism

Body-worn cameras are quietly taking over London

Surveillance nation — FoIs obtained by Huck reveal just how widespread body cams are among police and TfL staff. While promised to increase accountability, the proliferation of the tech raises questions over who it really serves.

Written by: Will Grimond

Activism

Tech workers are fighting back against employee surveillance

Power in numbers — Invasive workplace surveillance has become a reality for many remote workers over the pandemic. Now, tech workers are unionising to lead the resistance.

Written by: Sian Bradley

Activism

‘It’s a wild west’: Inside Margate’s Airbnb crisis

Homes not hotels — In recent years, an influx of visitors to the Kent coast has caused house prices to soar and a sense of community to be lost. While private landlords and lettings platform Airbnb benefit, local people are being forced out of their homes.

Written by: Sophie Church

Activism

The teen ‘finfluencers’ trying to keep hustle culture alive

Crypto kids — On ‘FinTok’, teenagers who’ve hit the crypto jackpot say they want to help their peers do the same – but are they simply perpetuating a broken capitalist system?

Written by: Chloé Meley

Signup to our newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter to informed with the cutting edge of sport, music and counterculture, featuring personal takes on the state of media and pop culture from Emma Garland, former Digital Editor of Huck, exclusive interviews, recommendations and more.

Please wait...

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.