Impending Armageddon: Should we be scared of a nuclear war?
- Text by Julia Martincic
- Photography by the bomb

It’s difficult to comprehend the devastation caused by a nuclear weapon – whole cities levelled out, severe burns and radiation sickness for those who survive. A quick look in the papers and the threat seems more real now than for ages. People are concerned about a potential conflict between China and US that could end in nuclear exchange. Russia’s apparently likely to bomb Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. It’s beginning to sound like there are lots of Cold Wars approaching.
We asked Robert Downes, MacArthur Fellow in Nuclear Security working at the Centre for Science and Security Studies, King’s College London, if we should be worried. He doesn’t think so. Kind of.
Should we be scared of a nuclear war? Has the threat actually become more prominent?
I don’t think so. In general, it’s highly unlikely that a country will use a nuclear weapon. If we should be scared of a nuclear war is a different question. Because, you know, the effects aren’t very nice.
How many countries have nuclear weapons at the moment?
Nine countries – the US, Russia, UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. Israel also have nuclear weapons but have never officially confirmed it.
Is it likely that terrorists would be able to get hold of nuclear weapons?
States guard nuclear weapons really closely, so it’s unlikely that they would be able to do so. Safety arrangements are really, really good in countries who have nuclear weapons. In the UK for example, they have a special branch of the police who are authorised to use lethal force up to 5 km from a nuclear facility. So it’s taken very seriously. What might be more likely is a state providing a group with weapons.
Ex-NATO chief Richard Shirreff said that a nuclear attack on Estonia, Lithuania or Latvia is a serious possibility – would you say this is true?
I think he’s talking balls – what would he predicate that statement on? Why would Russia risk a nuclear war to bomb these states? We should bear in mind that no one has used a nuclear weapon in conflict since 1945. There’s a solid international norm against using weapons because of the enormous international response it would provoke. We can’t look at it through a Cold War lens anymore.
Which country should we worry the most about having nuclear weapons?
Well, North Korea… They’re a bit concerning. Their actions are quite destabilising, and it’s difficult for people outside of the country to know what’s going on there. With the new leader, the ongoing famine and economic sanctions they’ve really managed to piss off everyone. In all of this they’re still developing nuclear weapons. But mostly it seems like they’re using these weapons as a tool to be taken seriously internationally.
What are the justifications for having nuclear weapons?
Nuclear weapons can provide an effective deterrent against actions of a state. By having nuclear weapons, we can assure that other states wouldn’t consider attacking us. People argue that they’re used in a political way with the hope that they should never be used – other than as a warning.
Why do people want to get rid of them?
There are lots of arguments for that. One is that nuclear weapons don’t have any military utility as you’re not supposed to use them. But there’s also the moral argument about the humanitarian impact and the possibility that the use of nuclear weapons could lead to a global catastrophe. Some people talk about a “nuclear winter” where the use of nuclear weapons leads to dust and particulate matter blocking out the sun, leading to everyone dying, which is a bit grim.
Are we seeing a shift in attitude towards nuclear weapons?
The UK debate about TRIDENT [British nuclear weapons] is really unusual, as we in the past have taken it as a given that we would continue to be a nuclear weapon state. It’s good that we’ve had a national conversation, but it also points to a heightened sense of the dangers.
So, on a scale of 1 to 10 how scared should I be right now?
Oh, I don’t know. I would say “not so scared”. Less scared than in the past. At the lower end, but some would consider it to be higher. I guess you can put me at 2 or 3?
Keep track of our Millennial Hopes and Fears online special.
Buy Huck 55 – The Freaked Out Issue in the Huck Shop now.
Enjoyed this article? Like Huck on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.
You might like

Largest-Ever Display of UK AIDS Memorial Quilt Opens at Tate Modern
Grief Made Visible — Comprising hundreds of panels made by lovers, friends and chosen family, the UK AIDS Memorial Quilt returns in full for the first time since 1994 – a testament to grief, friendship and the ongoing fight against HIV stigma.
Written by: Ella Glossop

The carnival and community of New York’s block parties
Soul of the Summer — Since attending his first street party in Crown Heights two decades ago, photographer Anderson Zaca has spent his summers travelling across New York’s five boroughs, documenting over 300 in the process.
Written by: Miss Rosen

The Getty Center’s first exclusively queer exhibition opens today
$3 Bill: Evidence of Queer Lives — Running until September, it features paintings, ephemera, video and photography to highlight LGBTQ+ histories, culture and people from 1900 to the present day.
Written by: Isaac Muk

Remembering New York’s ’90s gay scene via its vibrant nightclub flyers
Getting In — After coming out in his 20s, David Kennerley became a fixture on the city’s queer scene, while pocketing invites that he picked up along the way. His latest book dives into his rich archive.
Written by: Miss Rosen

On Alexander Skarsgård’s trousers, The Rehearsal, and the importance of weirdos
Freaks and Finances — In the May edition of our monthly culture newsletter, columnist Emma Garland reflects on the Swedish actor’s Cannes look, Nathan Fielder’s wild ambition, and Jafaican.
Written by: Emma Garland

Capturing life in the shadows of Canada’s largest oil refinery
The Cloud Factory — Growing up on the fringes of Saint John, New Brunswick, the Irving Oil Refinery was ever present for photographer Chris Donovan. His new photobook explores its lingering impacts on the city’s landscape and people.
Written by: Miss Rosen