Impending Armageddon: Should we be scared of a nuclear war?
It’s difficult to comprehend the devastation caused by a nuclear weapon – whole cities levelled out, severe burns and radiation sickness for those who survive. A quick look in the papers and the threat seems more real now than for ages. People are concerned about a potential conflict between China and US that could end in nuclear exchange. Russia’s apparently likely to bomb Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. It’s beginning to sound like there are lots of Cold Wars approaching.
We asked Robert Downes, MacArthur Fellow in Nuclear Security working at the Centre for Science and Security Studies, King’s College London, if we should be worried. He doesn’t think so. Kind of.
Should we be scared of a nuclear war? Has the threat actually become more prominent?
I don’t think so. In general, it’s highly unlikely that a country will use a nuclear weapon. If we should be scared of a nuclear war is a different question. Because, you know, the effects aren’t very nice.
How many countries have nuclear weapons at the moment?
Nine countries – the US, Russia, UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. Israel also have nuclear weapons but have never officially confirmed it.
Is it likely that terrorists would be able to get hold of nuclear weapons?
States guard nuclear weapons really closely, so it’s unlikely that they would be able to do so. Safety arrangements are really, really good in countries who have nuclear weapons. In the UK for example, they have a special branch of the police who are authorised to use lethal force up to 5 km from a nuclear facility. So it’s taken very seriously. What might be more likely is a state providing a group with weapons.
Ex-NATO chief Richard Shirreff said that a nuclear attack on Estonia, Lithuania or Latvia is a serious possibility – would you say this is true?
I think he’s talking balls – what would he predicate that statement on? Why would Russia risk a nuclear war to bomb these states? We should bear in mind that no one has used a nuclear weapon in conflict since 1945. There’s a solid international norm against using weapons because of the enormous international response it would provoke. We can’t look at it through a Cold War lens anymore.
Which country should we worry the most about having nuclear weapons?
Well, North Korea… They’re a bit concerning. Their actions are quite destabilising, and it’s difficult for people outside of the country to know what’s going on there. With the new leader, the ongoing famine and economic sanctions they’ve really managed to piss off everyone. In all of this they’re still developing nuclear weapons. But mostly it seems like they’re using these weapons as a tool to be taken seriously internationally.
What are the justifications for having nuclear weapons?
Nuclear weapons can provide an effective deterrent against actions of a state. By having nuclear weapons, we can assure that other states wouldn’t consider attacking us. People argue that they’re used in a political way with the hope that they should never be used – other than as a warning.
Why do people want to get rid of them?
There are lots of arguments for that. One is that nuclear weapons don’t have any military utility as you’re not supposed to use them. But there’s also the moral argument about the humanitarian impact and the possibility that the use of nuclear weapons could lead to a global catastrophe. Some people talk about a “nuclear winter” where the use of nuclear weapons leads to dust and particulate matter blocking out the sun, leading to everyone dying, which is a bit grim.
Are we seeing a shift in attitude towards nuclear weapons?
The UK debate about TRIDENT [British nuclear weapons] is really unusual, as we in the past have taken it as a given that we would continue to be a nuclear weapon state. It’s good that we’ve had a national conversation, but it also points to a heightened sense of the dangers.
So, on a scale of 1 to 10 how scared should I be right now?
Oh, I don’t know. I would say “not so scared”. Less scared than in the past. At the lower end, but some would consider it to be higher. I guess you can put me at 2 or 3?
Keep track of our Millennial Hopes and Fears online special.
Buy Huck 55 – The Freaked Out Issue in the Huck Shop now.
Enjoyed this article? Like Huck on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.
You might like
Halloween in Brooklyn, photographed over 50 years
Spirits and soul — Larry Racioppo’s new book documents half a century of the October festivities in New York, while tracing the city’s ever-changing character.
Cruising on the West Side Piers, New York’s wild side
West Side Highway — In the late 20th century, the area was an if-you-know-you-know hotspot for the city’s gay scene. William Howell’s new photobook immortalises it.
Ahilya Bamroo is Gen Z India’s authentic ambassador
Reel relatable — The influencer turned actor speaks about trolls, beauty standards and youth activism.
What went down at Huck’s 20th birthday party
84 issues and counting — We took over east London’s Jaguar Shoes with friends old and new to celebrate two decades and our new issue, with Tony Bontana taking the decks for a special set.
Inside the Los Angeles scene kid revival
The Rawring ’20s — For the cover of Huck 84, photographer Alexis Gross and writer Anna Zanes meet the latest faces of scene, who are finding freedom to express themselves through its technicolour, unafraid aesthetic.
Introducing our new issue of Huck Magazine: It Starts With Us
Huck 84 — For our second 20th anniversary issue, we spotlight 20 people and groups providing the world with a hopeful future.
