Is the rise of surrogacy deepening class divides?

The motherhood penalty — Increasingly, patients are avoiding pregnancy or time off work by paying someone else to carry their baby. Could this leave people unable to afford this service more vulnerable?

For the wealthy, parenthood without gestation has never been easier. Kim Kardashian, Nick Jonas, Amber Heard, and Elon Musk and Grimes are among the growing numbers of high-profile figures who have used surrogates in the past few years. According to West Coast Surrogacy, intended parents can expect to pay anywhere from $90,000 to $130,000 for their gestational surrogacy service. This eye-watering price tag hasn’t stopped a mass increase in surrogate-born children in the US, though, with the revenue of the global industry set to cross $27.5 billion in the next three years

But when some mothers have the luxury of designating the tasks of childcare and even pregnancy to other women, how will this effect those who don’t have that option? What impact this may have on working mothers is unprecedented, and many fear that Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs), like surrogacy, may only deepen class divides. 

While US employers are legally required to follow the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), many new parents have cited a huge discrepancy between these guidelines and their experiences in the workplace. For example, 2018 saw the jury of the Mosby-Meachem v. Memphis Light trial rule that an employer had violated the ADA by refusing to allow a new mother to work from home after she suffered complications from her pregnancy and her doctor put her on bedrest. 

Concerns about how pregnancy would impact her career are what led wedding photographer Mari Smith (not her real name) to search for a surrogate to carry her child instead. “I could be out [of work] three or four months,” she says. Her story, as told in Elle, relays her fears about protecting her livelihood. “People could forget about me. I have to be out there constantly producing and being visible.”

These fears are not unfounded. One employee was told that he “would be fired if his child ever appeared on Zoom” during a 2020 lockdown. As Marianne Cooper, writing in The Atlantic, said: “The ‘motherhood penalty’ results in mothers getting paid less and being passed over in hiring and promotion decisions.

“This dynamic sets the stage for maternal bias to occur,” Cooper continues. “Stereotypes, like the idea that mothers focus more on their children than their job, can draw a manager’s eye toward the few instances in which a mother fell short, and away from all the other times she delivered.”

In an attempt to avoid the burdens of pregnancy, the Guardian reported that a growing number of women are using “social surrogacy” arrangements. “They want to have babies that are biologically their own, but don’t want to carry them,” said Dr Vicken Sahakian, who works at the Pacific Fertility Center in Los Angeles. “There is no medical reason for them to use a surrogate; they just choose not to be pregnant.”

While surrogacy is typically associated with a clientele of same-sex male couples, a 2021 study from the University of Kent suggests that of the 413 UK couples in 2020 who had children via surrogacy, two-thirds were heterosexual. Comparatively, only 117 surrogate children were born in 2011, meaning that the number of parents using a surrogate has quadrupled in just a decade.

Amid this rise, workplaces continue to limit pregnancy-related breaks that go beyond the scope of delivery and recovery. In the US, workers who are exempt from overtime don’t have a guaranteed right to lactation breaks under federal law, even if they might be covered under state laws. And while UK employers are legally required to provide space for new mothers to breast pump or feed, there’s no legal requirement for bosses to give workers breastfeeding breaks during a shift. Under the spectre of capitalism, surrogacy – once aimed at those for whom it is impossible or dangerous to get pregnant and give birth – has become a way for the wealthy to stay unburdened by the physical limitations of pregnancy.

In some countries, surrogacy firms have also faced immense ethical criticism because of their treatment of workers. While UK surrogacy is limited to an altruistic model, in which surrogates are not paid but have their expenses covered, countries like India and Ukraine have a booming industry of surrogacy tourism. 

In Chennai, the surrogacy tourism industry was reported to be worth £1.3 billion a year, attracting worldwide clientele who come to the “rent a womb” capital of the world. Despite this staggering turnover, Indian surrogates are only paid between £4,602 and £13,805.85 per birth. In 2016, it was reported that 12,000 tourists visited India to hire surrogates, “many of them from the UK”. And while California has gained a reputation for its “surrogacy friendly” nature, surrogacy laws aren’t as favourable to surrogate workers as they may seem. In 2015, several surrogates took their case to the Supreme Court to clarify the rights of women and children within the surrogacy industry.

With so much potential for exploitation, it’s little surprise that there’s been a global clampdown on the surrogacy tourism trade. In the UK, British surrogates serve as the child’s legal parent after birth until parental status is transferred to the clients via family court, giving the gestational worker more leverage and power regarding the terms of their “employment”. As the parental order process can only be made with the surrogate’s consent, there’s a greater incentive for biological parents to treat their surrogate workers well. India has since followed a similar model, and chosen to limit its mass surrogacy tourist trade. 

But while working conditions for the surrogates themselves are improving, the growing accessibility and ease of social surrogacy holds unknown complications for working people who cannot afford this service. With many mothers still fighting for maternal rights in the workplace, the fear that an increase in social surrogacy will exacerbate class divides is only set to become more pertinent.

While the growing accessibility and affordability of ARTs isn’t necessarily a bad thing, the rights of mothers and pregnant people must be fought for. Pregnancy isn’t a burden, and nor should it be seen as such by employers.

Follow Katie Tobin on Twitter

Enjoyed this article? Like Huck on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.


Ad

Latest on Huck

Red shop frontage with "Open Out" branding and appointment-only signage.
Activism

Meet the trans-led hairdressers providing London with gender-affirming trims

Open Out — Since being founded in 2011, the Hoxton salon has become a crucial space the city’s LGBTQ+ community. Hannah Bentley caught up with co-founder Greygory Vass to hear about its growth, breaking down barbering binaries, and the recent Supreme Court ruling.

Written by: Hannah Bentley

Cyclists racing past Palestinian flag, yellow barriers, and spectators.
Sport

Gazan amputees secure Para-Cycling World Championships qualification

Gaza Sunbirds — Alaa al-Dali and Mohamed Asfour earned Palestine’s first-ever top-20 finish at the Para-Cycling World Cup in Belgium over the weekend.

Written by: Isaac Muk

Crowded festival site with tents, stalls and an illuminated red double-decker bus. Groups of people, including children, milling about on the muddy ground.
© Alan Tash Lodge
Music

New documentary revisits the radical history of UK free rave culture

Free Party: A Folk History — Directed by Aaron Trinder, it features first-hand stories from key crews including DiY, Spiral Tribe, Bedlam and Circus Warp, with public streaming available from May 30.

Written by: Isaac Muk

Weathered wooden building with a tall spire, person on horseback in foreground.
Culture

Rahim Fortune’s dreamlike vision of the Black American South

Reflections — In the Texas native’s debut solo show, he weaves familial history and documentary photography to challenge the region’s visual tropes.

Written by: Miss Rosen

A collage depicting a giant flup for mankind, with an image of the Earth surrounded by planets and people in sci-fi costumes.
Culture

Why Katy Perry’s space flight was one giant flop for mankind

Galactic girlbossing — In a widely-panned, 11-minute trip to the edge of the earth’s atmosphere, the ‘Women’s World’ singer joined an all-female space crew in an expensive vanity advert for Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin. Newsletter columnist Emma Garland explains its apocalypse indicating signs.

Written by: Emma Garland

Three orange book covers with the title "Foreign Fruit" against a dark background.
Culture

Katie Goh: “I want people to engage with the politics of oranges”

Foreign Fruit — In her new book, the Edinburgh-based writer traces her personal history through the citrus fruit’s global spread, from a village in China to Californian groves. Angela Hui caught up with her to find out more.

Written by: Katie Goh

Huck is supported by our readers, subscribers and Club Huck members. It is also made possible by sponsorship from:

Signup to our newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter to informed with the cutting edge of sport, music and counterculture, featuring personal takes on the state of media and pop culture from Emma Garland, former Digital Editor of Huck, exclusive interviews, recommendations and more.

Please wait...

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.