Sign up to our newsletter and become a Club Huck member.

Stay informed with the cutting edge of sport, music and counterculture

No, being kinky is not the same as being queer

From Where I Stand — When the Huffington Post decided to included kinksters in their definition of queer they disrespected a community that has been involuntarily fetishised for years.

A couple of days ago, the Huffington Post Queer Voices Twitter account shared an article they’d published on adult diaper kinks. It was met with confusion by many of the account’s followers, with people expressing their discomfort at the publication’s choice to include kink as an inherent part of the queer umbrella.

From that moment onwards, the account engaged in a heated back and forth defending the opinion that “‘non-normative’ sexualities, sex and fetishes all fall under the queer umbrella”. They’ve now stepped back a little and posted this tweet:

But the matter still hangs in the air: should or shouldn’t kink be included on the spectrum of queerness?

It’s a complicated discussion because queer as a term is in itself supposed to be a fuck-you the concept of labels and definition, but let me tell you the answer anyway. No, being kinky and participating in alternative sex does not make you a part of the queer community.

This isn’t just a personal opinion, it’s a politically conscious statement. The identities of LGBTQ people have been equated to fetishes as a way to dismiss and invalidate them for decades, and relationships between queer individuals are still constantly hypersexualised, portrayed as fetishes for a straight audience to enjoy. Considering being kinky as something similar to being queer ultimately means continuing to equate queerness to the sex you happen to enjoy having, which would be a mistake.

Queerness is an all-encompassing thing – an act of political resistance through its very existence – not just a rejection of what’s considered “normal” through alternative sexual practices. To reduce the queer identity to that is an over simplification and an insult. Queerness steps outside these norms, and defies the gender and sexual binary. Being queer is about identity, and that is more powerful and goes far beyond the sex we do (or don’t) have.

If we’re getting etymological, the word ‘queer’ was used for decades to ostracise and vilify individuals who weren’t straight; it’s a word that still makes some older people in the LGBTQ community shudder, and is still used as an insult today. As a word that has caused trauma to our community, it is only ours to reclaim and use as something empowering.

Being kinky doesn’t put you on a census, doesn’t keep you out of bathrooms, and it doesn’t get you thrown into conversion therapy as a pre-teen. Liking handcuffs does not mean young people in your community are four times more at risk of committing suicide than those who aren’t into handcuffs.

A straight man who enjoys being spanked very, very hard and likes to wear leather dog masks might feel hesitant talking to his girlfriend about his preferences, but that doesn’t mean he experiences life as a queer person. He is not at risk of violence in the street for his identity. He does not see people like him being murdered every day, neglected by a system that disrespects their gender identity even in death. He does not have centuries worth of violence and corrective rape inflicted on people with his identity to carry on his back.

Being for an open discussion on sex and sexual practices that stand outside of what is considered average by church-led sexual education is fantastic, promotes safety, and should be encouraged. Your kink preferences, given they are practiced with consenting and of age partners, are fine and should be respected, even celebrated. If you are into kink you can certainly be supportive of the LGBTQ community, and there may well be some overlap. All of this does not however give straight, cisgender people the right to identify as queer, or insert themselves into queer spaces, regardless of how many chains they have in their bedroom.

Assuring that our spaces, kinky or not, which we have fought for and are still fighting for around the world are not inherently hypersexualised and appropriated is not playing the so-called ‘Opression Olympics’. It’s ensuring that everyone who is a part of the queer community is taken into account and feels safe.

So no, being kinky does not make you queer.

Follow Biju on Twitter

Enjoyed this article? Like Huck on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

You might like

Culture

Free-spirited, otherworldly portraits of Mexico City’s queer youth

Birds — Pieter Henket’s new collaborative photobook creates a stage for CDMX’s LGBTQ+ community to express themselves without limitations, styling themselves with wild outfits that subvert gender and tradition.

Written by: Isaac Muk

Culture

The suave style and subtle codes of gay San Francisco in the ’70s

Seminal Works — Hal Fischer’s new photobook explores the photographer’s archive, in which he documented the street fashion and culture of the city post-Gay Liberation, and pre-AIDS pandemic.

Written by: Miss Rosen

Culture

The stripped, DIY experimentalism of SHOOT zine

Zine Scene — Conceived by photographer Paul Mpagi Sepuya in the ’00s, the publication’s photos injected vulnerability into gay portraiture, and provided a window into the characters of the Brooklyn arts scene. A new photobook collates work made across its seven issues.

Written by: Miss Rosen

Activism

Defiant photos of New York’s ’80s & ’90s queer activists

Arresting Images — Dona Ann McAdams’ photographs document the AIDS crisis, lesbian organising and civil disobedience from one of the most fraught eras in American LGBTQ+ history. A sale of her archive takes place later this month.

Written by: Sydney Lobe

Culture

When David Wojnarowicz became Arthur Rimbaud

Arthur Rimbaud in New York — In 1978, the American artist and his friends donned masks to pay tribute to the French poet, who was born a century before him. Miss Rosen traces the differing yet parallel lives of the queer revolutionaries.

Written by: Miss Rosen

Culture

Louis Theroux’s ‘Manosphere’ shows men aren’t the problem, platforms are

No Ws for Good Men — The journalist’s new documentary sees him dive headfirst into the toxicities and machinations of the male influencer economy. But when young creators are monetarily incentivised to make more and more outrageous content, who really is to blame?

Written by: Emma Garland

Huck is supported by our readers, subscribers and Club Huck members.

You've read articles this month Thanks for reading

Join Club Huck — it's free!

Valued Huck reader, thank you for engaging with our journalism and taking an interest in our dispatches from the sharp edge of culture, sport, music and rebellion.

We want to offer you the chance to join Club Huck [it's free!] where you will receive exclusive newsletters, including personal takes on the state of pop culture and media from columnist Emma Garland, culture recommendations, interviews and dispatches straight to your inbox.

You'll also get priority access to Huck events, merch discounts, and more fun surprises.

Already part of the club? Enter your email above and we'll get you logged in.